https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/s10053-022-00545-w
Regular Article – Optical Phenomena and Photonics
Effect of fiber properties and dispersion management on distortions associated with two subcarriers modulation of laser diode in radio over fiber systems
1
Laser Institute for Research and Applications LIRA, Beni-Suef University, 62511, Beni Suef, Egypt
2
Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Minia University, 61519, El-Minia, Egypt
3
Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, 80203, 21589, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
a
alaa.abutaleb@lira.bsu.edu.eg
Received:
27
July
2022
Accepted:
1
November
2022
Published online:
29
November
2022
We present numerical modeling and simulation on the effects of standard single-mode fiber (SSMF) properties and different dispersion management approaches on the distortions of laser diode. These distortions are associated with the two-tone modulation of laser diode for use in radio over fiber systems. The fiber properties include attenuation and dispersion. The dispersion management approaches include the use of nonzero dispersion-shifted fiber (NZ-DSF), fiber Brag grating (FBG), and dispersion-compensating fiber (DCF). The laser is directly modulated with two analog frequencies of 25 and 25.1 GHz at different modulation depths (m). The modulated laser signals are then propagated through SSMF at different lengths (L). The investigated laser signal distortions include the 2nd harmonic distortion (HD2), and the 2nd and 3rd intermodulation distortions (IMD2 and IMD3, respectively). The results reveal that all laser distortions are exacerbated as the fiber length increases, which is mainly due to the chromatic dispersion, while fiber attenuation has no effect. The use of dispersion management approaches gives almost similar effects on the reduction of IMD3 when L = 1 km, regardless of the value of m. Up to m = 0.3, DCF is the most effective approach for reducing all distortions over the entire fiber length range, while NZ-DSF is the least. When L = 2 km, FBG is the most effective approach for reducing both IMD2 and HD2 when m ≥ 0.4, whereas when L is increased to 6 km, DCF is the most effective approach up to m = 0.5.
© The Author(s) 2022
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
